Debate #9

Oct. 29th, 2005 09:07 am
loosechanj: (Default)
[personal profile] loosechanj
I think my lack of opposition to Intelligent Design is due to the fact that I don't see Evolution as being particularly more valid than a properly expressed ID theory. Darwin gives people who don't want to feel beholden to any higher power the comfort of living in a universe without one, whether that's reality or not.

Date: 2005-10-29 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loosechanj.livejournal.com
I've yet to see any empirical evidence for evolution.

Date: 2005-10-29 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shared-boxers.livejournal.com
Then you've yet to look. But, I'm not here to convince you. I've said my peace.

Date: 2005-10-29 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loosechanj.livejournal.com
I have looked, and what I've seen is mostly minor adaptations to a changed environment and quite a lot of futzing about with what one can consider a "species".

Date: 2005-10-29 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arachnophiliac.livejournal.com
More common creationist red herrings, distortions, and falsehoods. See here, here, and here.

One can't observe a complete stellar life-cycle either, but this doesn't render the fact of it false. Same with speciation events. Never mind that species is largely an artificial construct. If common descent is true, there are no hard boundaries in the history of life. Bacteria and humankind comprise a unity, not distinct entities.

Date: 2005-10-29 04:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loosechanj.livejournal.com
Like I'm gonna listen to the space pope. :-P

Date: 2005-10-29 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loosechanj.livejournal.com
All very good points, btw. But I still can't wrap my mind around *this* much complexity coming about within the age of the universe.

Date: 2005-10-29 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arachnophiliac.livejournal.com
Argument from incredulity is not scientific reasoning. :)

Ouch.

Date: 2005-10-30 02:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naruki-oni.livejournal.com
That makes creationists look pretty feebleminded, then. Well, mostly lazy, I should say.

"It's too hard! Just say Goddidit, please!"

But you still have to answer where God came from, and how He got all those amazing powers. Within the age of the universe.

Re: Ouch.

Date: 2005-10-30 12:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loosechanj.livejournal.com
No you don't. If he made everything that means time too. :-P

Ok.

Date: 2005-10-30 12:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naruki-oni.livejournal.com
But you still have to figure out where he came from and how.

The other problem is that you think 5 billion years is a short enough time that you can wrap your mind around it and decide that it's too short a time for all this stuff to happen. But 5 billion is a huge fucking number of years.

Hell, Bill Gates doesn't really understand what he's worth. He just wants more.

Profile

loosechanj: (Default)
loosechanj

February 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 12:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios